http://tucsonsammy.com/2009/11/11/174/ A libertarian curmudgeon who lurks near the ever changing geographic center of the Old Pueblo Sun, 28 Feb 2010 04:08:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://tucsonsammy.com/2009/11/11/174/comment-page-1/#comment-667 Dan Starr Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:25:12 +0000 http://tucsonsammy.com/?p=174#comment-667 Prop 200 "ill-conceived?" It's promotion "terrible?"If all that is so (and I would dispute both statements) you would be serving people better by explaining why you think so, not just making criticisms with no explanations or rationales. Frankly, this is what "the other side" does as a means of shutting off debate and engaging knee-jerk emotionalism. Perhaps you are correct, but why? I, for example, believed in and strongly supported Prop 200. They must be some reason. Am I stupid? Ignorant of some principle or some facts? Overly emotional? What? Let's have some rationale here for your conclusions. Prop 200 “ill-conceived?” It’s promotion “terrible?”If all that is so (and I would dispute both statements) you would be serving people better by explaining why you think so, not just making criticisms with no explanations or rationales. Frankly, this is what “the other side” does as a means of shutting off debate and engaging knee-jerk emotionalism. Perhaps you are correct, but why? I, for example, believed in and strongly supported Prop 200. They must be some reason. Am I stupid? Ignorant of some principle or some facts? Overly emotional? What? Let’s have some rationale here for your conclusions.

]]>