As if we were not troubled enough already, our city government has succeeded in putting together enough funding for a really bad idea.
How bad is it? Well, I watched a deeply moved Mayor Bob Walkup make the announcement to the City Council. He looked like he just received a telegram from Jesus saying that Tucson made the list for the Second Coming Tour. This idea is so bad, in fact, that Nina Trasoff interrupted him to thank him for â€œworking hardâ€ on the project, and for his â€œleadershipâ€.
What is it that makes the usual suspects so giddy? It is The Tucson Modern Streetcar Project. The â€œgood newsâ€ was that the U. S. Congress moved something to some kind of phase that virtually assures federal funding. This is the brass ring for the Tucson Department of Transportation, which took a blow when voters turned down a half-cent sales tax for transportation projects in 2003. Undaunted back then, it jumped through all the hoops, did all the studies, and landed the big score. Tucsonans are not off the funding hook entirely, however. According to Tucson Department of Transportation, money will also come from local sales taxes (RTA) and the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) plan.
The transportation guys were almost as giddy as Mayor Walkup, which is appropriate. After all, transportation projects are what they live for, it is that on which they spend their lives. Itâ€™s what they do.
The politicians, on the other hand, are supposed to look out for the interests of the people, and keep city agencies in their service. This project represents a failure of our elected representatives. People really do not need, nor do they want, more transit. Our elected city representatives want to repeat the mistakes of other municipalities, ten to twenty years behind the curve, when they should know better.
Letâ€™s say, for the sake of argument, that adding to the transit system is a good thing. It makes much more sense to increase bus service than build streetcar, trolley, or other light rail systems. According to the Government Accounting Office (GAO), new bus lines cost about two per cent of the cost of streetcars to start, cost less to maintain, and are much more flexible (you canâ€™t reroute track).
This is where someone shouts, â€œBut streetcars are sexier than busses! People will leave their cars to ride them!â€ Alas, this is a case of wishful thinking. According to Randal O’Toole of the Cato Institute, “The average number of trips taken per light-rail vehicle mile declined from 7.3 in 1995 to 5.2 in 2005, indicating that light rail is suffering from a serious case of diminishing returns.” Many of the very positive rider numbers being bandied about come from samples taken on the first few days of operation, when the thing is new, and people have endured months of hype. After checking it out for a ride or two, people go back to their cars.
I would also suggest that we try a little first hand objective observation. Go to the nearest major street and look at it. How many people are moving down it in cars, how many are traveling in busses â€“ even when bus riding is subsidized! What does that say about the choice of the people? Trust your own observations.
Speaking of observations, when was the last time you heard someone say, â€œGee, I wish there was a subsidized way for me to go back and forth between the University of Arizona and downtown Tucson!â€ Has it been a while? Did you see dozens of people filling the trolley cars to overflowing the last time you were on 4th Avenue? As you might be guessing at this point, thatâ€™s where our â€œmodern streetcarâ€ is going. Say what you like about Steve Farley, but at least he knew where to put his bad idea.
So, it leads one to wonder, who are our elected officials representing, the people or themselves? Half of the City Council will be up for election in 2009, including Nina Trasoff. Bob Walkup will be up in 2011. Elections are a good time to let politicians know who is calling the shots.