Archive for November, 2006

Thanksgiving

Thursday, November 23rd, 2006

Thanksgiving is the last of the American religious holidays. It’s about gratitude; more specifically, it’s about thanking God. Expressing gratitude to God should not be a dry practice. It is a practice that is full of love and joy. Few things reach the core of the heart more than song, and few songs have been sung in celebration of Thanksgiving than “We Gather Together.”

Captivating melodies often originate in folk tunes, and such is the case with “We Gather Together”. It’s origins have been traced back to sixteenth century Netherlands. There, new lyrics were put to the melody to celebrate the end of Spanish oppression of the local protestants. It has been speculated that the Pilgrims may have actually been familiar with the song, having spent time in the Netherlands before sailing for Virginia and ending up in what was to become Massachusetts.

I don’t want to give away my age, but I am old enough to have fond memories of singing this hymn every year for the Thanksgiving concert at my local government school (we also sang Christmas carols in Latin, but that is a story for another time).

Actually, “fond” is an understatement. When I hear it, I get choked up and tears come to my eyes. If you want to see what I mean, click the following link and read the lyrics while the melody plays:

http://www.hymnsite.com/lyrics/umh131.sht

Happy Thanksgiving. Thank you God.

  • Share/Bookmark

More Post-Election Thoughts

Sunday, November 12th, 2006

Sometimes…no, often the most interesting feature of an election, or any event of consequence, is that which does not happen. I fully expected that there would be much Democrat wailing and gnashing of teeth on the night of the election, and the morning thereafter – the usual claims of voter fraud, intimidation, racism, Diebold, homophobia, blah, blah, blah. I expected these because the Dems have established this pattern of behavior around Republican victories, of which I assumed there would be some of note. There were not, and there was no Democrat uproar. What does this reveal? The revelation is that Democrat accusations have nothing to do with facts, and are merely an attempt to de-legitimize Republican victories.

Speaking of voter fraud, this election begged for it. It is in very close elections that the few extra votes from the dead people, or the absentee ballots disqualified, that can really make the difference. As the title of Hugh Hewitt’s book succinctly puts it, “If It’s Not Close, They Can’t Cheat”. Almost all the pivotal races had razor thin margins.

So, did the Republican fix with the Diebold machines swing it, or did the people who voted six or seven times and the fake ballots from the reservations win it for the Democrats?

The answer is in the results.

If you ever hear another lefty whine about Republicans and the Diebold company, please smack ‘em.

  • Share/Bookmark

A Great Darkness Fell on the Land

Wednesday, November 8th, 2006

Our country is entering a period of darkness. I’m referring, of course, to Britney’s divorce…just kidding. As I was saying, our country is entering a period of darkness, but we have endured similar states of affairs in my lifetime, the Carter administration comes to mind, and have come through them O.K.

Speaking of Jimmy Carter, can we put him under house arrest or something? I mean, he goes to North Korea and puts a deal together for President Clinton that helped create the problem we face today by handing them nuke technology, and looking the other way while the initiated their bomb program. Always warm for the dictator, he certifies the election in Venezuela that delivered Hugo Chavez to power. The “Carter Center” certified the election without checking the computer vote totals against the paper totals – as you recall, there were “problems” with the computerized machines, so officials had to go in and “fix” them in the middle of Election Day. Now Daniel Ortega, Soviet supported commie strongman from the eighties, gets elected in Nicaragua, and Jimmy has already had his first suck-up meeting with him. Unbelievable!

Carter is considered by some to be the first anti-American president. Now, we may have the first anti-American Congress. With committee chairmanships going to the likes of John Dingle, John Conyers, Charlie Wrangle, Henry Waxman …I must stop, the nausea is starting.

What will this mean? A veritable subpoenarama! Everyone in the Bush administration will be up for grabs. Impeachment is a definite maybe. Republicans were hurt by the impeachment of Clinton, so the Democrats may hold off until they are sure that the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post has softened everyone up enough. John Conyers is “chompin’ at the bit”, as the President might say, to move forward with it, though he can’t move forward alone.

What happened? Well, the Republicans thought they had it made, and began acting like it. There is a reason that the Democrat and Republican parties are referred to as the Evil Party and the Stupid Party respectively.

  • Share/Bookmark

Kerry Kerfuffle

Friday, November 3rd, 2006

Beloved fans,

I apologize for dropping out of sight. Frankly, I was all but ready to abandon the blog effort. As many of you know, I have joined the team of real writers on insidetrackaz.com, a brilliant site that supports the Inside Track radio program heard every Saturday on 690 KVOI. I am honored to rub shoulders with the likes of Tom Danehy, Mike Tully, and the big guy himself, EF (Emil Franzi). By the way, if you like the photograph of me doing a press-check on my Kimber, check out photograph of me hefting a 60’s vintage Colts SP-1 (AR-15). From the start page at www.insidetrackaz.com, click “columns” on the tool bar, then click “Jonathan Hoffman” (my pen name), and you’ll see it! This is a big step up for a simple wage-earning blue-collar member of the proletariat such as myself, and it has occupied all of my blog time; and yet, I miss my faithful readers and my little piece of the blogosphere.

Jack’s back.

I really feel the need to jump in here on behalf of Senator Kerry. I disagree with Senator Kerry on just about anything policywise, but I am able to be objective, and take him at his word.

Now, when I heard the controversial statement he made about how education is important, and if you study, do your homework, and get smart (not the television show), you can be successful, otherwise you end up stuck in Iraq (insert rimshot here), it was clear to me that he was talking about Sadam Hussein. No really! Think about it. Sadam could have gone to school and become a doctor, lawyer, civil engineer, and have immigrated to anywhere he wished. Instead, he became a despot, a career with no educational prerequisites, and became stuck in Iraq. Only someone like Karl Rove would think that he was referring to the troops.

Then on the following day, Senator Kerry went on a rant explaining that he was, in fact, referring to the president, Sadam Hussein, and not the troops. He added that it was President Sadam that owed the troops an apology, not him. Does anybody really disagree with that?

  • Share/Bookmark