Archive for February, 2006

“When school children start paying dues, that’s when I’ll start representing the interests of schools children”

Tuesday, February 21st, 2006

While pandering to unionized teachers, Slade Mead suggested that… O.K., let me start this again. While speaking before members of the Tucson Education Association, Slade Mead proposed increasing teacher’s salaries, and dismantling the AIMS test.

Well, he did not use the term “dismantling”, but the message was clear – he’s on the side of accountability avoidance. Specifically, he proposed that passing the test no longer be the whole enchilada regarding high school graduation, but only sixty per cent; the other forty per cent coming from course work.

The purpose of the AIMS test is to measure the effectiveness of the course work. How can you substitute the test with that which the test is supposed to measure? Of course, you can’t; but the idea is to get rid of the test because it could hold teachers accountable. Remember his audience: the Tucson Education Association (TEA), a chapter of the National Education Association (NEA), a labor union representing teachers.

All the unions that represent teachers make noise about “rigorous standards” and “accountability”, but they fight those things tooth and nail. Their interests lie with the payers of dues, namely the teachers. As Albert Shanker said when he was president of the American Federation of Teachers, “When school children start paying dues, that’s when I’ll start representing the interests of schools children”. Good honesty there Mr. Shanker!

Slade Mead is running against Tom Horne (didn’t Steve McQueen play him in a movie?) for superintendent of public instruction.

Mr. Horne supports the AIMS test as a graduation requirement, and suggests that it also serves as a motivator for students and teachers.

“Cinderella Man”- did this really come out of Hollywood?

Thursday, February 16th, 2006

Well, I finally got around to seeing the film “Cinderella Man”, the Ron Howard film about the life of Jim Braddock starring Russell Crowe and Renee Zellweger. My curiosity was piqued by none other than Michael Medved when he said, in an offhanded way, that it did not get the attention that it deserved.

Call me a cynic, but I figured that if Hollywood and the PC media were looking the other way, it must have redeeming qualities.

Boy did it ever! I have found Ron Howard films to be pretty politically neutral – as was this one; but the protagonist (Braddock) was a humble man of staunch character – the classic American Hero.

I’m sure that the faces of any lefties watching this film turned as red as the star on their Chairman Mao caps. Braddock went to heroic lengths to keep his family together – including demeaning himself by begging, and applying for assistance. Later, when he could afford it, he paid back the assistance money (see what I mean?). While he sacrificed his pride, he never wavered regarding morality. I doubt if many people could make that distinction today.

The Great Depression was Bradock’s tormenter in the first part of the film, then it became personified in the form World Champion Heavyweight Max Baer. In the film, Max Baer was (can you guess?) a single, garishly wealthy, egomaniacal womanizer – the stereotype of today’s Hollywood celebrity. During the ultimate battle between good and evil (the fight between Baer and Braddock), Baer engages in all forms of gamesmanship, from verbal taunting of the most vulgar kind, to illegal punches including low blows and a backhand. Braddock is the intensely focused professional, fighting for the welfare of his family.

The film is technically very good, and the acting of Crowe and Zellweger is great. It’s probably Howard’s best film. It’s also the best boxing film since “The Harder They Fall”, even though it is not a boxing film per se.

If you have a child who is old enough to watch fight sequences, and/or you thirst for a tale that champions traditional values, don’t rent this film – buy a copy!

On a Mission Downtown

Friday, February 10th, 2006

Alas, between my day job and other projects, I really have been neglecting the blog. I had hoped to post more clever and insightful stuff today, but ended up down at the City Clerk’s Office pouring over old campaign finance reports instead.

I know it sounds terribly boring, but it really is interesting and somewhat fun…no, really! The object of today’s exercise was to trace the route of out-of-state money to our local City Council election.

I parked in the garage under the Tucson/Pima County Library and, after completing my business there, wandered west toward City Hall. I’m slightly embarrassed to admit that I can’t seem to figure out the stair system between the garage and the library. The elevator takes you from the middle of the garage to the lobby of the library. The stairs from the garage take you to a door that goes to the outside of the library – which is O.K., but there are stairs that go from the lobby to the garage, and I can’t seem to find those. When I take them from the lobby to the garage, they stop before my level and I have to walk over to the elevator and use it to get to my car. Weird.

Anyway, I walked over to that city park between the county and city buildings. There was a small banner announcing “Farmer’s Market Today”. I wandered over to four tables and hot dog stand that made up the “market”, and was disappointed to see nothing for sale that one normally associates with a farm. There were some baskets, costume jewelry, and other kitch; but nothing edible besides the hot dogs.

I continued to the city building, the east side of which was labeled “Council Chambers”. A closer look revealed a rather large, verbose sign that, in its essence, said, “If you’re not a cop, you can’t bring a weapon in here.”

Now, I’m not sure of the sign’s purpose. At first blush, it would appear that the city people are afraid that someone might attack a member of the Tucson City Council. If this were true, would it not be more to the point to simply declare, “Attacks on Councilmen Not Permitted”? In that way, they would remove any doubt as to whether or not cops are allowed to attack the Councilmen, and they would be relieved of all the expense and hassle of providing a check service for the weapons. If, on the other hand, the purpose is to gratuitously hassle and demean the more responsible among us, I must say that the sign does the job.

Fortunately for me, my business took me to the north entrance through which I gained access (computer geeks – please note that “access” is a noun) to the elevators. On the ninth floor, I found the office of the City Clerk of Tucson.

A warm and friendly receptionist asked how she might help me, and I explained that I wished to review the campaign reports of the independent campaign committees from the last city election. I anticipated a little resistance since the only incentive she had was her professionalism. I was delighted to find myself treated like a valued customer as she found someone who was quick to retrieve the four large binders, and find a desk at which I could work.

It’s actually fun to poke through public records – particularly when you find the prize in short order, then relax while you continue to fish until your fingertips hurt and your brain gets foggy. It took less than two hours to fog my brain, but by that time I had sixteen pages of information that I wanted copied. Unfortunately, the copying duty was referred to a quite young and inappropriately dressed employee who was preoccupied with a pierced ear gone bad. After an inordinate amount of time, the job was completed. One page was missing, but it was not the prize so I did not care. I paid the ten cent per copy fee (why do they even bother?), and was on my way with my specific information – complete with documentation – that would please the editor to whom I was pitching my latest article. Happy ending!

Moral of the story: When attempting to navigate a government complex with government buildings, don’t try to make sense of it; just stay focused on the mission and breath deeply – it might even be fun!

Econ 101

Thursday, February 2nd, 2006

I try not to go national very often, but every twice in a while someone writes something of significance and importance. In this case, it is a brief column written by Renaissance man, and all-round nice guy, Ben Stein. It is entitled “Oil is Well”, and can be read in it’s entirety at the following url:

http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=9350

The beauty of Stein’s column is not only the timeliness, but also the simple way – in layman’s terms – that he describes free markets using the Oil Industry (that would be the “awl bidness” for those of you in Texas) as an example.

If you have any thinking children, this might be a good time to sit down with them, over a cup of hot cocoa, and explain the economic facts of life using this column as a tool.

If you know some young person who has yet to be poisoned by Leftists, a printed copy of Steins piece might inoculate him.

When I finished reading it, I let out a long sigh and thought, “Thanks Ben!”