<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Election Thoughts - Last Time, I Promise!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tucsonsammy.com/2005/11/20/more-election-thoughts-last-time-i-promise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tucsonsammy.com/2005/11/20/more-election-thoughts-last-time-i-promise/</link>
	<description>A libertarian curmudgeon who lurks near the ever changing geographic center of the Old Pueblo</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Alpha Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://tucsonsammy.com/2005/11/20/more-election-thoughts-last-time-i-promise/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>The Alpha Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsonsammy.com/2005/11/20/more-election-thoughts-last-time-i-promise/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with your assessment, and cringe at the thought of an  
all-democratic council. Will they offer Tom Volgy a volunteer  
position as spirit guide? Will they go after gun shows at the TCC  
again (a struggle in which, shamefully, Republican mayor Walkup  
joined them the last time)?

However, the Alpha Environmentalist welcomes one item on the agenda,  
assuming (doubtful) they can actually carry through with it: Impact  
fees. Big ones. Yes. Let the real free market rule in Tucson's growth  
sector. You want to move to our city? Welcome, and . . .PAY YOUR OWN  
WAY!

I read the developers' sham report purporting to show how growth  
really does pay for itself. Sorry, but if growth paid for itself  
Tucson would not be saddled with one of the highest municipal tax  
rates in the country. That isn't the fault of tax-and-spend Dems;  
it's because those of us already here are forced to pay for the  
roads, traffic lights, water, sewer, police, fire protection, and who  
knows what else for those moving here. If growth paid for itself,  
natives like me would be getting rebate checks every year.

- Jonathan Hanson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your assessment, and cringe at the thought of an<br />
all-democratic council. Will they offer Tom Volgy a volunteer<br />
position as spirit guide? Will they go after gun shows at the TCC<br />
again (a struggle in which, shamefully, Republican mayor Walkup<br />
joined them the last time)?</p>
<p>However, the Alpha Environmentalist welcomes one item on the agenda,<br />
assuming (doubtful) they can actually carry through with it: Impact<br />
fees. Big ones. Yes. Let the real free market rule in Tucson&#8217;s growth<br />
sector. You want to move to our city? Welcome, and . . .PAY YOUR OWN<br />
WAY!</p>
<p>I read the developers&#8217; sham report purporting to show how growth<br />
really does pay for itself. Sorry, but if growth paid for itself<br />
Tucson would not be saddled with one of the highest municipal tax<br />
rates in the country. That isn&#8217;t the fault of tax-and-spend Dems;<br />
it&#8217;s because those of us already here are forced to pay for the<br />
roads, traffic lights, water, sewer, police, fire protection, and who<br />
knows what else for those moving here. If growth paid for itself,<br />
natives like me would be getting rebate checks every year.</p>
<p>- Jonathan Hanson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
